PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.68%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 13.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 24.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
G&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 10.77%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.29%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 185.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
69.77%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 48.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
0.75%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.45%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
80.52%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-156.85%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 813.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.50%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.58%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.19%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.26%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.