95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 6.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 5.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 7.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Margin decline while NEM shows 1.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.96%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 91.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 3.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 4.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.48%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.66%
Similar other expenses growth to NEM's 72.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NEM's 6.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14030.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.62%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.