PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.44%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 17.10%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.53%
Cost growth 50-75% of NEM's 12.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-0.52%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 26.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.82%
Margin decline while NEM shows 7.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 13.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
828.79%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.40%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 534.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.27%
Total costs growth less than half of NEM's 79.29%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.67%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.26%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 229.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.99%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.14%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.37%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
183.39%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.08%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.43%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 35.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
116.27%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.08%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.67%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.