PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.44%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
19.36%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.08%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
G&A growth while NEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 760.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.32%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.54%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.75%
EBITDA growth below 50% of NEM's 94.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.90%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 4234.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of NEM's 115.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.49%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 141.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-176.76%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 26.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.94%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 223.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 238.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.04%
Net income decline while NEM shows 1073.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.14%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 1192.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
EPS decline while NEM shows 1067.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 1070.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.05%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.