PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.04%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.72%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth 50-75% of NEM's 12.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 22.64%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 113200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 141.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 835.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 978.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 138.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 146.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of NEM's 90.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-32.95%
Net income decline while NEM shows 123.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 128.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while NEM shows 123.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 123.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.