95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.79%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.92%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-692.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.96%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 17.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.58%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
116.67%
Interest expense growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.90%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 17.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.91%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to NEM's 0.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-17.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.80%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.14%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-17.73%
Net income decline while NEM shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.30%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.88%
EPS decline while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.88%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count change of 0.02% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while NEM shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.