PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Similar revenue growth to NEM's 57.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
45.91%
Cost growth less than half of NEM's 119.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
43.20%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x NEM's 20.00%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 57.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.11%
Total costs growth less than half of NEM's 97.93%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.56%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 139.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
53.28%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 187.77%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
50.51%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.13%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 12.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.82%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.39%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-107.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.63%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 60.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.74%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 23.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 22.86%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.