95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 2.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 446.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.28%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 439.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 20.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
140.62%
Marketing expense change of 140.62% while NEM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
70.89%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.25%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 2.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 215.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 18.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.08%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 298.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 294.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
888.96%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 109.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 114.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 113.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
99.20%
Similar tax expense growth to NEM's 122.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-2.61%
Net income decline while NEM shows 105.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 105.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.26%
EPS decline while NEM shows 104.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 104.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 17.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 17.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.