95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.09%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.08%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.25%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.06%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.23%
G&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 13.00%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-95.20%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.07%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.73%
Total costs growth less than half of NEM's 7.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.39%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.01%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.11%
Similar operating income growth to NEM's 5.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.98%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.20%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 22.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.39%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 2.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.23%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.54%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 27.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.42%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 8.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.63%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.93%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 8.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 8.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.05%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.