PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Similar revenue growth to NEM's 24.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-42.05%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 0.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
60.21%
Similar gross profit growth to NEM's 76.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
29.79%
Margin expansion 50-75% of NEM's 41.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 13.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 30.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
98.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.07%
Interest expense growth less than half of NEM's 8.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.81%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.26%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 46.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.79%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 18.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.15%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 82.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.84%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 46.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.72%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.18%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 93.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 55.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.25%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 187.70%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-43.00%
Net income decline while NEM shows 52.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.82%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 22.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while NEM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.