PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
135.58%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.89%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-18.39%
Margin decline while NEM shows 3.22% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth while NEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-98.02%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 430.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-85.70%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 34.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-93.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.28%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 15.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
55.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 31.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
147.14%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.91%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 259.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 20.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
91.50%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 37.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.97%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
188.14%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 34.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
133.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 53.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 10600.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 10600.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.