95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.97%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
10.64%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.43%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.97%
Interest expense growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.59%
Similar EBITDA growth to NEM's 13.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.38%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.42%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 2.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.03%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 129.23%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.90%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of NEM's 26.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.91%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.07%
Net income growth below 50% of NEM's 122.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.57%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.04%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.05%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.