95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 37.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 21.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.63%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PAAS's 82.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.43%
Margin expansion below 50% of PAAS's 32.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.25%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PAAS's 175.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.25%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 742.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.56%
Operating income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Operating margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
775.68%
Tax expense growth less than half of PAAS's 2221.52%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.89%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.37%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
20.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 1.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.