95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.91%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 2.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.49%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 17.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 1.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PAAS's 5.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-4.98%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 14.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.10%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 1.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.15%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 130.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.99%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 5.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while PAAS shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.54%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 10.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.50%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 9.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 6.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.67%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.61%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 6.79%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 6.35%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.