PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.50%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 10.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.48%
Cost growth less than half of PAAS's 18.82%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.30%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 2.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.00%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 33.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.28%
Operating expenses reduction while PAAS shows 16.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.20%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 18.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.59%
Interest expense change of 3.59% while PAAS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-14.49%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 36.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.16%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 4.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.65%
Other expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 63.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-6.01%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 2.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
145.30%
Tax expense growth while PAAS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.06%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 29.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.11%
Net margin decline while PAAS shows 16.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 29.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 30.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.34%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.70%
Diluted share increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.