95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 18.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.81%
Similar cost growth to PAAS's 23.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
80.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 10.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.30%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A growth less than half of PAAS's 160.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
88.65%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
D&A growth while PAAS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.74%
Similar EBITDA growth to PAAS's 46.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-9.55%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 23.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.00%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PAAS's 77.44%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.53%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 49.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
140.04%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PAAS's 119.54%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
77.13%
Similar pre-tax income growth to PAAS's 84.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 55.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-84.22%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 145.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.62%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 60.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 35.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 59.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 59.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.79%
Diluted share increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.