PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 21.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 4.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 789.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while PAAS shows 631.49% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 1.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 28.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 30.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PAAS's 148.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 122.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 113.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 111.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PAAS's 114.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 111.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 146.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of PAAS's 107.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 106.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of PAAS's 107.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PAAS's 107.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 1.27%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.