95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 4.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.00%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 17.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.86%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.96%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.99%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 298.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 57.50%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.15%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 18.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 27.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.60%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.81%
Other expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 348.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
168.82%
Tax expense growth while PAAS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
463.45%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
635.77%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
460.00%
EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.