PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Similar revenue growth to PAAS's 18.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
22.50%
Similar cost growth to PAAS's 27.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
15.06%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
20.94%
Similar total costs growth to PAAS's 21.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-9.14%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 175.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.09%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x PAAS's 19.75%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-139.74%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of PAAS's 198.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.31%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 152.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2772.70%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 2931.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-307.96%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 213.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while PAAS shows 164.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.86%
Tax expense growth less than half of PAAS's 273.62%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-306.84%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 183.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-273.15%
Net margin decline while PAAS shows 139.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 190.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 190.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.