95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.60%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 4.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
10.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.05%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
G&A growth while PAAS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 20.73%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 4.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.22%
Interest expense growth less than half of PAAS's 2486.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.08%
Similar D&A growth to PAAS's 8.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
3.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PAAS's 11.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.20%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 6.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.39%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3964.56%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
365.59%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-564.74%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 153.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
367.01%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
338.10%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.