95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Positive growth while PAAS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.78%
Cost increase while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.55%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.36%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth while PAAS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 61.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 11.02%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.12%
Interest expense growth less than half of PAAS's 1853.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.87%
D&A growth while PAAS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.36%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 1.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PAAS's 176.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-79.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.