95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 21.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.07%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 14.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.27%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 110.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.86%
Margin decline while PAAS shows 72.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
G&A reduction while PAAS shows 27.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-308.55%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 94.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.80%
Operating expenses reduction while PAAS shows 63.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.61%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 17.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 140.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.17%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 16.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-137.27%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 67.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.36%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 11.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-286.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-322.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-364.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2407.27%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 22.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-317.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-358.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-315.38%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 350.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-315.38%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 350.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.31%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 18.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 18.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.