95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 43.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 66.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 10.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
G&A reduction while PAAS shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 50.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 44.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 29.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 57.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.48%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PAAS's 9.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
74.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 201.90%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PAAS's 71.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 19.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14030.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Net income growth below 50% of PAAS's 157.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.62%
Net margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 79.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of PAAS's 158.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PAAS's 158.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while PAAS shows 0.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.