PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 4.20%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-0.10%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
19.36%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.08%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x PAAS's 31.96%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.32%
Similar operating expenses growth to PAAS's 36.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.54%
Total costs growth less than half of PAAS's 9.29%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.86%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 14.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.75%
Similar EBITDA growth to PAAS's 10.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.90%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 22.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of PAAS's 71.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.49%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 65.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-176.76%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 580.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.94%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 104.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while PAAS shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.04%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 445.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.14%
Net margin decline while PAAS shows 423.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 414.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 414.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.