PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 3.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.04%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 120.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.72%
Margin expansion below 50% of PAAS's 111.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth less than half of PAAS's 246.44%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.72%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 29.78%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 259.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 26.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 616.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 588.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 55.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 116.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while PAAS shows 115.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth while PAAS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.95%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 109.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while PAAS shows 109.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 109.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 109.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.