95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.55%
Revenue growth below 50% of PAAS's 63.95%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
16.66%
Cost growth less than half of PAAS's 81.83%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
29.24%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.60%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
G&A reduction while PAAS shows 68.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.98%
Operating expenses reduction while PAAS shows 44.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.67%
Total costs growth less than half of PAAS's 77.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-97.39%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 560.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.44%
D&A growth less than half of PAAS's 105.06%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
42.01%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.39%
EBITDA margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.10%
Operating income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.97%
Operating margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.98%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.24%
Tax expense growth while PAAS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.98%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 72.98%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 72.96%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.