95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 8.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x PAAS's 5.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
43.20%
Similar gross profit growth to PAAS's 40.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.81%
Margin decline while PAAS shows 29.51% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
Similar G&A growth to PAAS's 23.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 60.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PAAS's 18.25%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
43.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
53.28%
D&A growth while PAAS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.51%
EBITDA growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.82%
Operating income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.39%
Operating margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-107.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.74%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.02%
Diluted share increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.