PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 13.82%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-42.05%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 15.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
60.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 9.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.79%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
98.70%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Interest expense growth less than half of PAAS's 13.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.81%
D&A growth 50-75% of PAAS's 44.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-18.26%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 56.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.79%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 37.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.15%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 67.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.84%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 47.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.72%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.18%
Pre-tax income decline while PAAS shows 73.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Pre-tax margin decline while PAAS shows 52.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.25%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of PAAS's 61.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-43.00%
Net income decline while PAAS shows 88.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.82%
Net margin decline while PAAS shows 65.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.12%
EPS decline while PAAS shows 87.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.12%
Diluted EPS decline while PAAS shows 87.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while PAAS shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while PAAS is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.