95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.55%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.55%
Positive growth while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
355.66%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RGLD's 11.64%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.17%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.32%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.76%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Similar other expenses growth to RGLD's 121.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-70.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
224.31%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.65%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.