95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.50%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.48%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.30%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.94%
Margin decline while RGLD shows 1.70% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.00%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.28%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.20%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.59%
Interest expense change of 3.59% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-14.49%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.14%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.65%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 8.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
145.30%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.11%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 11.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.34%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 17.58%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 16.99%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.