95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 17.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.01%
Cost growth less than half of RGLD's 86.11%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
32.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 8.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.51%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Other expenses change of 22.47% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
41.31%
Similar operating expenses growth to RGLD's 40.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
21.65%
Total costs growth less than half of RGLD's 53.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
16.23%
Interest expense change of 16.23% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
35.54%
D&A growth 50-75% of RGLD's 50.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
33.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 5.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.41%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.93%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.01%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-39.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.88%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.18%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.18%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.71%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.25%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 3.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.49%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 4.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.