95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
222.53%
Cost growth above 1.5x RGLD's 3.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-82.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.30%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.42%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 74.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
147.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RGLD's 60.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.48%
D&A growth less than half of RGLD's 93.01%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-86.12%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2651.65%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 4738.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-365.99%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 269.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-365.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 306.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-119.87%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 283.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-362.24%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 272.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-361.52%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 309.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 270.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-325.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 264.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.15%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.54%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.