95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 17.25%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
75.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x RGLD's 33.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
62.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 16.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 16.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
58.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RGLD's 18.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x RGLD's 14.71%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
85.52%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 18.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.10%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
82.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 15.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.34%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
82.05%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.87%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.05%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.04%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 6.81%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 6.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.