95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.89%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.72%
Cost growth less than half of RGLD's 243.98%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.63%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.45%
Other expenses change of 124.45% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.45%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.41%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.39%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.98%
Operating margin decline while RGLD shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.