95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 29.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 423.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of RGLD's 349.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-31.77%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 111.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.35%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 31.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.44%
Similar interest expense growth to RGLD's 116.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while RGLD shows 29.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 28.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 28.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 21.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-81.35%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 22.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.36%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 20.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.71%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.00%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 19.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 16.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.