95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.22%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 9.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.44%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 0.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RGLD's 17.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Margin expansion below 50% of RGLD's 7.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.22%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.90%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.55%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.35%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 13.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of RGLD's 24.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 14.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.73%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 28.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.72%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 43.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 30.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.11%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.01%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 88.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.96%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 72.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 93.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 93.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.