PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.36%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.70%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-25.34%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
G&A growth less than half of RGLD's 19.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-256.67%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.98%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RGLD's 19.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.06%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
87.31%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
905.79%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1088.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-235.01%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1057.27%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1267.31%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.44%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.