95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.00%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
52.04%
Cost growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 20.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.57%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 52.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RGLD's 9.66%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-46.80%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
66.29%
D&A growth above 1.5x RGLD's 5.77%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
23.32%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.54%
Other expenses growth less than half of RGLD's 96.95%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.36%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.98%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 514.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.72%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.94%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.