95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.80%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 0.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.06%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 7.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.88%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 42.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.92%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.96%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 45.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.40%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 14.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.37%
Interest expense reduction while RGLD shows 16.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.05%
D&A reduction while RGLD shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.88%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1578.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-288.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-302.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5700.00%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 825.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-278.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-291.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.06%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.