PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.83%
Similar revenue growth to RGLD's 32.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
40.51%
Cost growth 50-75% of RGLD's 59.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
16.30%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.07%
Other expenses change of 51.07% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
37.18%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.29%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x RGLD's 34.19%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
218.69%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RGLD's 23.36%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
50.21%
Similar D&A growth to RGLD's 48.85%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
31.23%
Similar EBITDA growth to RGLD's 39.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 5.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.77%
Operating income growth below 50% of RGLD's 28.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.72%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-68.55%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 31.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
78.26%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.45%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 133.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.87%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 125.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while RGLD shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while RGLD shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.