95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.48%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.49%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 6.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.71%
Margin decline while RGLD shows 12.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
G&A growth less than half of RGLD's 31.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.64%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RGLD's 36.73%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.07%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
408.21%
Interest expense growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.94%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.96%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.04%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 5.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
96.53%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
123.83%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.78%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
124.21%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.89%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.81%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.