95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.28%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses change of 34.38% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-59.13%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.55%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.94%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of RGLD's 18.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
19.52%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 8.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 65.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.49%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 3.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.