95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.59%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 3.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.01%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 6.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.62%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 1.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.43%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.93%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-34.11%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-22.45%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 6.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.79%
Interest expense reduction while RGLD shows 66.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.96%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 3.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.08%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.52%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.78%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-220.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.87%
Similar tax expense growth to RGLD's 189.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-18.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.92%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.05%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.11%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.