95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Revenue growth below 50% of RGLD's 24.01%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.55%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 23.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
18.63%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of RGLD's 24.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
9.98%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth above 1.5x RGLD's 16.69%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Other expenses change of 10.66% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RGLD's 16.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.28%
Total costs growth less than half of RGLD's 22.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.64%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.21%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.76%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 25.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.03%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 0.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 18.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.91%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.24%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 21.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.03%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 14.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.44%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 23.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 22.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.95%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 22.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.