95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.55%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.66%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
29.24%
Positive growth while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.60%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.13%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.67%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-97.39%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
22.44%
D&A growth 50-75% of RGLD's 34.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
42.01%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.39%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.10%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.97%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.98%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.24%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.98%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Net margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 17.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.00%
EPS change of 28.00% while RGLD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.00%
Diluted EPS change of 28.00% while RGLD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.