95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.19%
Revenue growth below 50% of RGLD's 16.92%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.45%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.00%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RGLD's 29.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.71%
Margin expansion 50-75% of RGLD's 10.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
375.31%
Marketing expense change of 375.31% while RGLD maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
3913.82%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.05%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.63%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.21%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RGLD's 17.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of RGLD's 35.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 15.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-33.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of RGLD's 34.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.60%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 15.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
188027.38%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.44%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 72.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.31%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 47.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 70.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 70.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.