95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.97%
Growth of 6.97% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-0.76%
Cost reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
10.64%
Growth of 10.64% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
3.43%
Margin change of 3.43% while SA shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
G&A reduction while SA shows 13.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.47%
Other expenses reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.77%
Operating expenses reduction while SA shows 13.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.45%
Total costs reduction while SA shows 13.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.97%
Interest expense growth less than half of SA's 22.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.59%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.38%
Margin change of 3.38% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
13.42%
Operating income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.03%
Margin change of 6.03% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
36.68%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.90%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.47%
Margin change of 6.47% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
6.91%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.07%
Similar net income growth to SA's 16.85%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
7.57%
Margin change of 7.57% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.29%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 5.30%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 5.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.