95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.49%
Growth of 1.49% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.50%
Cost growth of 1.50% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
1.48%
Growth of 1.48% while SA shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-0.00%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.00%
Other expenses change of 28.00% while SA maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.12%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SA's 23.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.24%
Total costs growth less than half of SA's 23.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3925.00%
Interest expense change of 3925.00% while SA maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
28.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x SA's 8.86%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.05%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.84%
Margin change of 2.84% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.13%
Operating income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.34%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10587.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1271.67%
Tax expense growth while SA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.88%
Net margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.21%
Share count reduction below 50% of SA's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.66%
Diluted share reduction while SA shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.