PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
G&A reduction while SA shows 4.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SA's 2.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while SA shows 4.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while SA shows 4.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while SA shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while SA shows 0.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.81%
Margin change of 1.81% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of SA's 407.95%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SA's 89.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Margin change of 8.41% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of SA's 78.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Margin change of 8.67% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of SA's 78.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SA's 78.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of SA's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SA's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.