PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.61%
Growth of 0.61% while SA shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.81%
Cost growth of 1.81% while SA maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.00%
Margin decline while SA shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
G&A reduction while SA shows 24.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.35%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.07%
Operating expenses reduction while SA shows 24.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.14%
Total costs growth less than half of SA's 24.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-25.89%
Interest expense reduction while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.43%
D&A growth while SA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.61%
EBITDA growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.87%
Margin change of 0.87% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Operating margin decline while SA shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.31%
Other expenses growth while SA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Pre-tax income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.62%
Margin change of 2.62% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-885.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
21.86%
Net income growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.12%
Margin change of 21.12% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
18.18%
EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while SA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of SA's 0.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SA's 3.33%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.